Any business looking to move to new premises or transform existing office space faces a number of key decisions. Chief among these is which procurement pathway to take – a choice that can prove instrumental in helping to create a positive and productive work environment.
While there are several options available, more often than not businesses find themselves choosing between two main approaches: office design & build and traditional procurement. But which is right for your organisation? Selecting the appropriate procurement model is crucial to achieving an office fitout that matches your workforce needs and overall business objectives.
Here we explain the fundamental differences between design & build and traditional procurement. Highlighting each method’s key features, advantages and disadvantages, we provide insights to help you make informed decisions about the best route for your business.
Design & build is a comprehensive, turnkey solution which brings together a number of core services, from design, specification and consultancy through to project management and construction. Whether you’re engaged in office relocation or refurbishment, the design & build method offers a modern and integrated approach to procurement, with all design and construction requirements covered within one contract.
More streamlined than the traditional procurement model, design & build is a cohesive and cost-effective option, leading to seamless transitions between stages, reduced delays and accelerated project delivery. Meanwhile, a single point of contact for all design and construction phases makes for clearer communication and decision-making.
When businesses enter into a design & build contract, they hire a single company to manage the whole project from beginning to end. Once appointed, the company oversees every stage of the design & build office fitout process. They devise the workplace strategy and develop design concepts, then manage the planning and procurement and deliver all construction work.
Your corporate office interior design & build company will either have all the required capabilities under one roof, or will directly manage its own specialist subcontractors. Either way, you benefit from your contractor being involved in the early stages, which increases the practical design aspect – or ‘buildability’ – of your project. This means the transition from concept to construction should be relatively smooth, with design and build phases often overlapping.
The office design & build procurement route is becoming increasingly popular among UK businesses due to its multiple efficiency gains. With design & build projects taking on average
5-12 weeks from beginning to end, this option enables fast and efficient refurbishment of new, empty or existing office space, benefitting both landlords and tenants.
Design & build also shifts all responsibility to the contractor, which de-risks the procurement process for you, the client. What’s more, costs are fixed from the outset, providing 100% cost certainty and reducing the likelihood of budget overruns.
Design & build procurement will suit some companies less than others, but overall there are relatively few disadvantages to this route. Those occasionally cited include:
Traditional procurement, also known as ‘Design Bid Build’, is the conventional approach to project delivery. The key characteristics of the traditional procurement method include the bifurcation of design and construction, with stages managed sequentially by individual contractors.
Within this procurement pathway, the client sets the design and budget scope. An architect or design consultancy typically leads the design development, with contractors providing specialist services as the project advances. Individual contractors can include interior designers, IT consultants, project managers and furniture experts, among others, with building contractors coming on board at a later stage.
Workplace programmes that adopt traditional procurement typically have longer lead times due to the scale of the work involved. Projects can last between 12 and 36 months – project duration which is best served by traditional architecture and more conventional methods. It is a route favoured by global businesses and PLCs, who tend to trust in more long-established and orthodox practices.
The traditional procurement approach is divided into three key stages: Design, Bid and Build. Here’s how they work:
Unlike design & build, where responsibility is allocated to a single contractor, with traditional procurement the client remains central at all times. As client, you’ll be actively involved in appointing and coordinating all individual contractors and specialists. While this means you retain greater control over key project elements and decisions, managing all moving parts can take up a great deal of time and energy.
Some believe the siloed and sequential nature of traditional procurement helps to clarify roles and responsibilities. Others, meanwhile, argue that the pivotal role played by the client, who has to manage all communication and decision-making, can lead to miscommunication and delays.
The advantages of traditional procurement are mainly concerned with ownership and control. For clients who have a strong idea of the vision they’re trying to achieve, and of how their project should progress, the traditional method could be the best option. If you like to keep a close eye on project detail, and if you prefer to collaborate closely with designers and architects, the dynamics of traditional procurement may suit you well.
The key advantages include:
Traditional procurement is a good option for large, specialist and complex projects and companies with flexible budgets. But the emergence of design & build has served to highlight some of the disadvantages associated with the traditional route. These include:
Traditional procurement is also sometimes referred to as Detail & Build, which describes a similarly orthodox process for design, planning and delivery of office renovation, refurbishment or new build. Detail & Build begins with design development, following by a detailed preconstruction phase comprising planning and budgeting. As with other traditional procurement routes, Detail & Build involves the separation of design and construction, requiring rigorous project management, collaboration and coordination at all times.
Whether you opt for traditional procurement or design & build depends on the type of business you run/work for and your specific project requirements. To help you compare and contrast these two pathways we’ve provided the table below, highlighting the key features of each and the principal differences between them.
When it comes to choosing between traditional procurement and design & build, you need to think carefully about your project priorities. Consider the key differences between the two approaches, and think about which best fits your requirements.
Do you value being in control and having a clear view of project details? Do you have sufficient flex in your budget to accommodate unforeseen costs? And do you prefer to trust in established methods that prioritise quality over speed? If so, traditional procurement is probably for you.
If, on the other hand, you value fixed-cost certainties, efficiency, and accelerated project delivery, and if you’d rather a project team deal with all communication and take on the risk and responsibility, then design & build will be your best option.
Download our guide to office design companies, or contact us to get more information on how to find the best design partner for your workplace.